Dual abelian variety

In mathematics, a dual abelian variety can be defined from an abelian variety A, defined over a field K.

1 Definition
2 History
3 Dual isogeny (elliptic curve case)
4 Construction of the dual isogeny
5 Notes
6 References

Definition

To an abelian variety A over a field k, one associates a dual abelian variety A^v (over the same field), which is the solution to the following moduli problem. A family of degree 0 line bundles parametrized by a k-variety T is defined to be a line bundle L on A×T such that

for all $t \in T$ , the restriction of L to A×{t} is a degree 0 line bundle,
the restriction of L to {0}×T is a trivial line bundle (here 0 is the identity of A).

Then there is a variety A^v and a family of degree 0 line bundles P, the Poincaré bundle, parametrized by A^v such that a family L on T is associated a unique morphism f: T → A^v so that L is isomorphic to the pullback of P along the morphism 1_A×f: A×T → A×A^v. Applying this to the case when T is a point, we see that the points of A^v correspond to line bundles of degree 0 on A, so there is a natural group operation on A^v given by tensor product of line bundles, which makes it into an abelian variety.

In the language of representable functor one can state the above result as follows. The contravariant functor, which associates to each k-variety T the set of families of degree 0 line bundles on T and to each k-morphism f: T → T' the mapping induced by the pullback with f, is representable. The universal element representing this functor is the pair (A^v, P).

This association is a duality in the sense that there is a natural isomorphism between the double dual A^vv and A (defined via the Poincaré bundle) and that it is contravariant functorial, i.e. it associates to all morphisms f: A → B dual morphisms f^v: B^v → A^v in a compatible way. The n-torsion of an abelian variety and the n-torsion of its dual are dual to each other when n is coprime to the characteristic of the base. In general - for all n - the n-torsion group schemes of dual abelian varieties are Cartier duals of each other. This generalizes the Weil pairing for elliptic curves.

History

The theory was first put into a good form when K was the field of complex numbers. In that case there is a general form of duality between the Albanese variety of a complete variety V, and its Picard variety; this was realised, for definitions in terms of complex tori, as soon as André Weil had given a general definition of Albanese variety. For an abelian variety A, the Albanese variety is A itself, so the dual should be Pic⁰(A), the connected component of what in contemporary terminology is the Picard scheme.

For the case of the Jacobian variety J of a compact Riemann surface C, the choice of a principal polarization of J gives rise to an identification of J with its own Picard variety. This in a sense is just a consequence of Abel's theorem. For general abelian varieties, still over the complex numbers, A is in the same isogeny class as its dual. An explicit isogeny can be constructed by use of an invertible sheaf L on A (i.e. in this case a holomorphic line bundle), when the subgroup

K(L)

of translations on L that take L into an isomorphic copy is itself finite. In that case, the quotient

A/K(L)

is isomorphic to the dual abelian variety Â.

This construction of Â extends to any field K of characteristic zero.^[1] In terms of this definition, the Poincaré bundle, a universal line bundle can be defined on

A × Â.

The construction when K has characteristic p uses scheme theory. The definition of K(L) has to be in terms of a group scheme that is a scheme-theoretic stabilizer, and the quotient taken is now a quotient by a subgroup scheme.^[2]

Dual isogeny (elliptic curve case)

Given an isogeny

$f�: E \rightarrow E'$

of elliptic curves of degree $n$ , the dual isogeny is an isogeny

$\hat{f}�: E' \rightarrow E$

of the same degree such that

$f \circ \hat{f} = [n].$

Here $[n]$ denotes the multiplication-by- $n$ isogeny $e\mapsto ne$ which has degree $n^2.$

Construction of the dual isogeny

Often only the existence of a dual isogeny is needed, but it can be explicitly given as the composition

$E'\rightarrow \mbox{Div}^0(E')\to\mbox{Div}^0(E)\rightarrow E\,$

where ${\mathrm{Div}}^0$ is the group of divisors of degree 0. To do this, we need maps $E \rightarrow {\mbox{Div}}^0(E)$ given by $P\to P - O$ where $O$ is the neutral point of $E$ and ${\mbox{Div}}^0(E) \rightarrow E\,$ given by $\sum n_P P \to \sum n_P P.$

To see that $f \circ \hat{f} = [n]$ , note that the original isogeny $f$ can be written as a composite

$E \rightarrow {\mbox{Div}}^0(E)\to {\mbox{Div}}^0(E')\to E'\,$

and that since $f$ is finite of degree $n$ , $f_* f^*$ is multiplication by $n$ on ${\mbox{Div}}^0(E').$

Alternatively, we can use the smaller Picard group ${\mathrm{Pic}}^0$ , a quotient of ${\mbox{Div}}^0.$ The map $E\rightarrow {\mbox{Div}}^0(E)$ descends to an isomorphism, $E\to{\mbox{Pic}}^0(E).$ The dual isogeny is

$E' \to {\mbox{Pic}}^0(E')\to {\mbox{Pic}}^0(E)\to E\,$

Note that the relation $f \circ \hat{f} = [n]$ also implies the conjugate relation $\hat{f} \circ f = [n].$ Indeed, let $\phi = \hat{f} \circ f.$ Then $\phi \circ \hat{f} = \hat{f} \circ [n] = [n] \circ \hat{f}.$ But $\hat{f}$ is surjective, so we must have $\phi = [n].$

Notes

^ Mumford, Abelian Varieties, pp.74-80
^ Mumford, Abelian Varieties, p.123 onwards

References

Mumford, David (1985). Abelian Varieties (2nd edition ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195605280.

This article incorporates material from Dual isogeny on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.